SHARE
COPY LINK

EARNINGS

ThyssenKrupp books huge stainless steel hit

German industrial giant ThyssenKrupp said Friday it booked heavy losses in its business year just ended owing to massive €2.9 billion ($3.9 billion) in writedowns on its US and stainless steel businesses.

ThyssenKrupp books huge stainless steel hit
Photo:DPA

ThyssenKrupp said in a statement it booked bottom-line net loss of €1.783 billion in the 12 months to September compared with profit of €927 million a year earlier, on a 15 percent rise in sales to €49.09.

The group — the world’s fourteenth biggest steelmaker and also a leading manufacturer of elevators, submarines and car parts — explained that it had decided to write down €2.9 billion on its US and stainless steel businesses because book values of those assets were “no longer in line with market conditions.”

There had been cost overruns on the construction of a plant in Brazil, which could not be offset in the near term and there was renewed weakness of the markets in the US and Europe, “which is hampering market entry for the products of the Steel Americas business area,” it said.

“The current environment is not easy,” said chief executive Heinrich Hiesinger, who took the reins of ThyssenKrupp at the beginning of the year. But “writedowns show that we’re doing everything necessary,” he said.

ThyssenKrupp shares were among the biggest losers on the Frankfurt stock exchange on Friday, showing a loss of nearly 2.0 percent in a generally firmer market, despite the announcement that the group intended to pay a stable dividend of €0.45 per share for the 2010/2011 financial year.

AFP/jcw

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

FARMING

WTO rules US tariffs on Spanish olives breach rules

A US decision to slap steep import duties on Spanish olives over claims they benefited from subsidies constituted a violation of international trade rules, the World Trade Organisation ruled Friday.

WTO rules US tariffs on Spanish olives breach rules
Farmers had just begun harvesting olives in southern Spain when former US President Donald Trump soured the mood with the tariffs' announcement. Photo: Jorge Guerrero/AFP

Former US president Donald Trump’s administration slapped extra tariffs on Spain’s iconic agricultural export in 2018, considering their olives were subsidised and being dumped on the US market at prices below their real value.

The combined rates of the anti-subsidy and anti-dumping duties go as high as 44 percent.

The European Commission, which handles trade policy for the 27 EU states, said the move was unacceptable and turned to the WTO, where a panel of experts was appointed to examine the case.

In Friday’s ruling, the WTO panel agreed with the EU’s argument that the anti-subsidy duties were illegal.

But it did not support its stance that the US anti-dumping duties violated international trade rules.

The panel said it “recommended that the United States bring its measures into conformity with its obligations”.

EU trade commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis hailed the ruling, pointing out that the US duties “severely hit Spanish olive producers.”

Demonstrators take part in a 2019 protest in Madrid, called by the olive sector
Demonstrators take part in a 2019 protest in Madrid called by the olive sector to denounce low prices of olive oil and the 25 percent tariff that Spanish olives and olive oil faced in the United States. (Photo by PIERRE-PHILIPPE MARCOU / AFP)
 

“We now expect the US to take the appropriate steps to implement the WTO ruling, so that exports of ripe olives from Spain to the US can resume under normal conditions,” he said.

The European Commission charges that Spain’s exports of ripe olives to the United States, which previously raked in €67 million ($75.6 million) annually, have shrunk by nearly 60 percent since the duties were imposed.

The office of the US Trade Representative in Washington did not immediately comment on the ruling.

According to WTO rules, the parties have 60 days to file for an appeal.

If the United States does file an appeal though, it would basically amount to a veto of the ruling.

That is because the WTO Appellate Body — also known as the supreme court of world trade — stopped functioning in late 2019 after Washington blocked the appointment of new judges.

SHOW COMMENTS