SHARE
COPY LINK

MUHAMMAD

Charlie Hebdo and the Muhammad cartoons row

The suspected firebombing of the French satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo is the latest twist in the six-year-old controversy over images of the Muslim prophet Muhammad published by Western media.

The involvement of Charlie Hebdo, which has built its reputation on attacking both religious and political leaders of all complexions, dates back to its decision to publish the images of the prophet in 2006.

The row broke out in September 2005 when the Danish newspaper Jyllands Posten published 12 drawings focused on Islam, several of which were seen as linking both the religion and the prophet Mohammed to modern terrorism and suicide bombings.

At the time the war in mainly Muslim Iraq, initiated by the US-led invasion that had overthrown the regime of Saddam Hussein, was in full swing, and the threat of Islamic extremism had been underlined by the deadly attacks that had hit London less than three months earlier.

One of the drawings by cartoonist Kurt Westergaard, who subsequently had to go into hiding, showed the prophet with a hat in the shape of a bomb.

Muslims were angered both by the association of their religion with terrorism and by the showing of images of Muhammad, which most consider blasphemous in and of themselves.

Anger over the Jyllands Posten cartoons began to build throughout the Muslim world in late 2005; in January 2006 Saudi Arabia reacted by withdrawing its ambassador to Denmark.

The following month newspapers in several other countries, including Charlie Hebdo in France, published the images in support of the Danish paper.

Anger continued over the following years, with dozens dead in violent protests in several Muslim countries.

In February 2008 Danish police said they had foiled a plot to murder the cartoonist and the following month Al-Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden threatened Europe with a “reckoning” over the affair.

In June of the same year eight people died in a bomb attack on the Danish embassy in the Pakistani capital Islamabad.

Following the publication of the cartoons in France, two Muslim organisations brought a lawsuit against Charlie Hebdo, but it was thrown out in 2007.

The satirical weekly has linked its decision to return to the controversy this week — by publishing an issue supposedly “edited” by the Prophet Muhammad — to recent events in north Africa.

The National Transitional Council in Libya has said the new regime it will create to replace that of Muamma Qaddhafi will be based on Islamic law and in neighbouring Tunisia an Islamic party emerged as the winner in constituent elections.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

TERRORISM

Charlie Hebdo terror attacks: French court jails accomplices

A Paris court on Wednesday handed jail terms ranging from four years to life to more than a dozen people convicted of helping Islamist gunmen who attacked satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo and customers at a Jewish supermarket in January 2015.

Charlie Hebdo terror attacks: French court jails accomplices
Court sketches of the 14 accused. Photo: AFP

Survivors and family members of the dead sat in silence as the verdicts were read out, which they hailed afterwards as a victory for justice and freedom of speech after a sometimes traumatic trial that revived the horror of the killings.

The editor of Charlie Hebdo Laurent “Riss” Sourisseau, who lives under round-the-clock police protection, was also in court to hear the sentencing by a five-member team of magistrates who had listened to evidence against the accused over three months. 

“It's been painful, searing. It's been a stage in our mourning process, necessary and unavoidable,” said a lawyer for Charlie Hebdo, Richard Malka. “I hope it's the start of something else, of an awareness, a wake up call.” 

In the absence of the attackers themselves — all three were killed by security forces in the days after their rampage — French investigators instead focused on accomplices to the men, including their weapon suppliers.

The main accused, Ali Riza Polat, was judged to have known about his friend Amedy Coulibaly's plans to take part in the attacks, and was given a 30-year sentence for complicity, which he immediately said he would appeal.

Another 10 accused were present in court, all men ranging from 29 to 68 years old with prior criminal records but no terror convictions. They were all found guilty on a range of charges.

In all, 13 sentences were handed down, including to two accused who were tried in absentia: Hayat Boumeddiene, the partner of gunman Coulibaly, received a 30-year sentence, while Mohamed Belhoucine, a known Islamic extremist, was handed a life term.

Both of them are presumed to be in Syria and may be dead.

A fourteenth suspect was not sentenced because he was convicted in a separate terror trial earlier this year and is thought to dead. 

'Freedom has last word' 

During the attacks in January 2015, seventeen people were killed over three days, beginning with the massacre of 12 people at Charlie Hebdo magazine by brothers Said and Cherif Kouachi.

They said they were acting on behalf of Al-Qaeda to avenge Charlie Hebdo's decision to publish cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed, while Coulibaly had sworn loyalty to the Islamic State group.

Coulibaly was responsible for the murder of a French policewoman and a hostage-taking at a Hyper Cacher market in which four Jewish men were killed.

Those shot dead in the Charlie Hebdo office included some of France's most celebrated cartoonists such as Jean Cabut, known as Cabu, 76, Georges Wolinski, 80, and Stephane “Charb” Charbonnier, 47.

To mark the start of the trial on September 2, the fiercely anti-religion magazine defiantly republished the prophet cartoons, leading to a fresh violence and protests against France in many Muslim countries.

Three weeks later, a Pakistani man wounded two people outside the magazine's former offices, hacking at them with a cleaver.

On October 16, a young Chechen refugee beheaded teacher Samuel Paty who had showed some of the caricatures to his pupils.

And on October 29, three people were killed when a young Tunisian recently arrived in Europe went on a stabbing spree in a church in the Mediterranean city of Nice.

President Emmanuel Macron's government has introduced legislation to tackle radical Islamist activity in France, a bill that has stirred anger in some Muslim countries.

On the cover of its new issue published before the verdicts, Charlie Hebdo in typically provocative style published a picture of God being led away in a police van with the title “God put in his place”.

“The cycle of violence, which had began in the offices of Charlie Hebdo, will finally be closed,” editor Riss, who was badly injured in the attacks, wrote in an editorial.

“At least from the perspective of criminal law, because from a human one, the consequences will never be erased,,” he added.

'Thanks to justice' 

The Charlie Hebdo killings triggered a global outpouring of solidarity with France under the “I am Charlie” slogan and signalled the start of a wave of Islamist attacks around Europe.

Later that year, in November 2015, Paris was again besieged when Islamist gunmen went on the rampage at the Bataclan concert hall, the national stadium and at a host of bars and restaurants.

A trial of the only surviving gunman and suspected accomplices is expected to start in September next year. 

Christophe Deloire, the head of press freedom group Reporters Without Borders (RSF), said he welcomed the verdict in court on Wednesday.

“It is proof that violent extremists don't have the last word. Thanks to justice, it is freedom that has the last word,” he wrote on Twitter.

Patrick Klugman, lawyer for the victims at Hyper Cacher, said: “For most of the victims… I believe that they have feeling of having been heard.”

SHOW COMMENTS