SHARE
COPY LINK

EUROPE

Media roundup: Plotting the euro’s future in Paris

With the eurozone debt crisis still simmering, Germany and France have proposed an economic government for Europe’s currency union. But newspapers in The Local’s media roundup aren’t so sure it will be enough to save the euro.

Media roundup: Plotting the euro's future in Paris
Photo: DPA

Though many German commentators welcomed a vow on Tuesday by Berlin and Paris to beef up fiscal coordination within the eurozone as a first step towards curbing Europe’s woes, the financial markets were less impressed.

The Frankfurt Stock Exchange lost ground in early trading on Wednesday, as shares in the stock market operator Deutsche Börse fell by more than six percent owing to a proposed tax on financial transactions.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy made the proposal to strengthen economic integration among the 17 countries using the euro at an anxiously anticipated summit meeting late on Tuesday in Paris.

But Merkel brushed aside calls for eurobonds, seen by many as a means of alleviating the risk of debt contagion. And Sarkozy suggested on Tuesday such a move could only come in the wake of greater integration.

Many newspapers in The Local’s media roundup on Wednesday welcomed the Paris initiative, but some remained sceptical over whether it would help alleviate the current debt crisis.

Berlin’s centrist daily Der Tagesspiegel said the summit was proof that Europe’s Franco-German engine was alive and well.

“It might sound melodramatic, but what Nicolas Sarkozy and Angela Merkel announced on Tuesday evening after their consultations is the most visionary fiscal and economic policy in Europe since the introduction of the euro,” the paper wrote.

“A common currency cannot function without a coordinated economic, tax and fiscal policies. Greece is on the verge of bankruptcy because all of that is lacking. One can only hope that Merkel and Sarkozy didn’t come up with their proposal akin to a magician pulling a rabbit out of hat – but rather in concert with (other important European) leaders in Madrid, Rome, The Hague and Lisbon.”

Nuremberg’s regional daily the Nürnberger Nachrichten agreed Paris and Berlin could not make important decisions about the eurozone’s future alone.

“But it finally seems as if Angela Merkel and Nicolas Sarkozy have realized just how serious the euro situation is. They’re jumping over their shadows and tackling tough subjects that particularly the chancellor had previously avoided. The crisis has shaken them free of their paralysis.

“But scepticism will remain until there are concrete agreements, as there have been plenty of similar announcements made at various summits before. And no matter how important Paris and Berlin are for the EU, they will now have to convince many other partners of the courageous path they’ve decided to take.”

The business daily Financial Times Deutschland warned there could be fierce opposition to the proposal to anchor a debt limit in the constitutions of all eurozone members.

“It’s an affront by the Europe’s two leading powers to the national parliaments of the eurozone. In many countries there are likely to be reservations about having austerity dictated to them, making such a suggestion extremely risky. If just one country rejects it, the intended goal of stabilizing the financial markets would be missed and the opposite achieved. Crucially, not even France has passed legislation for an overall borrowing cap yet.”

And other commentaries showed how divided Germany remains on whether to sanction eurobonds as a solution to the debt crisis.

“Eurobonds will come,” wrote Bonn regional daily the General-Anzeiger. “They are unavoidable and compared to a constantly growing rescue fund and a central bank mutating into a ‘bad bank’ from buying up bonds, they represent the more honest course. The transfer union is already here. That must be extremely clear to Merkel by now – only she can’t sell that to the Germans (and especially the FDP) without risking her chancellorship.”

The Leipziger Volkszeitung, however, couldn’t disagree more with that assessment.

“She didn’t give in this time, the chancellor. There won’t be eurobonds for the time being – and that’s an extremely good thing,” wrote the paper.

“Germany, deep in debt itself and now with a weakening economy, cannot be responsible for the entire debt of Europe. What wastrel wouldn’t think about spending money again when offered cheap credit? Eurobonds would win some time, but wouldn’t be a solution. They’re a political excuse to keep postponing things until the bitter end.”

The Local/AFP/mry

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

COVID-19

Court turns down AfD-led challenge to Germany’s spending in pandemic

The German Constitutional Court rejected challenges Tuesday to Berlin's participation in the European Union's coronavirus recovery fund, but expressed some reservations about the massive package.

Court turns down AfD-led challenge to Germany's spending in pandemic

Germany last year ratified the €750-billion ($790-billion) fund, which offers loans and grants to EU countries hit hardest by the pandemic.

The court in Karlsruhe ruled on two challenges, one submitted by a former founder of the far-right AfD party, and the other by a businessman.

They argued the fund could ultimately lead to Germany, Europe’s biggest economy, having to take on the debts of other EU member states on a permanent basis.

But the Constitutional Court judges ruled the EU measure does not violate Germany’s Basic Law, which forbids the government from sharing other countries’ debts.

READ ALSO: Germany plans return to debt-limit rules in 2023

The judgement noted the government had stressed that the plan was “intended to be a one-time instrument in reaction to an unprecedented crisis”.

It also noted that the German parliament retains “sufficient influence in the decision-making process as to how the funds provided will be used”.

The judges, who ruled six to one against the challenges, did however express some reservations.

They questioned whether paying out such a large amount over the planned period – until 2026 – could really be considered “an exceptional measure” to fight the pandemic.

At least 37 percent of the funds are aimed at achieving climate targets, the judges said, noting it was hard to see a link between combating global warming and the pandemic.

READ ALSO: Germany to fast-track disputed €200 billion energy fund

They also warned against any permanent mechanism that could lead to EU members taking on joint liability over the long term.

Berenberg Bank economist Holger Schmieding said the ruling had “raised serious doubts whether the joint issuance to finance the fund is in line with” EU treaties.

“The German court — once again — emphasised German limits for EU fiscal integration,” he said.

The court had already thrown out a legal challenge, in April 2021, that had initially stopped Berlin from ratifying the financial package.

Along with French President Emmanuel Macron, then chancellor Angela Merkel sketched out the fund in 2020, which eventually was agreed by the EU’s 27 members in December.

The first funds were disbursed in summer 2021, with the most given to Italy and Spain, both hit hard by the pandemic.

SHOW COMMENTS