SHARE
COPY LINK

FINE

Tenant fined for painting room ‘abnormally’ green

A tenant in Gothenburg has been fined over 30,000 kronor ($4,660) for carrying out shoddy and unfinished painting work and for choosing the wrong shade of green for his bedroom.

Tenant fined for painting room 'abnormally' green

The landlord, who owns two properties in central Gothenburg, lived in the flat until 2007, and claims it was well maintained.

According to Hem & Hyra, a paper published by the Swedish Tenants’ Association (Hyresgästföreningen) the landlord had tried to recapture the spirit of the time the property was built by sanding down floors and skirting boards and oiling them.

But when the tenant moved out of the two-floor apartment some two years later, there was little left of the wooden surfaces. Instead the tenant had painted over these with white paint, and left the job unfinished to boot.

The tenant had allegedly also started work on the stairwell and several other rooms, but not finished the work, reported the paper.

After an inspection it was established that the work had been carried out in a very amateurish way. But it wasn’t just badly done – it was ugly as well.

The tenant had chosen to paint one of the bedrooms in what the landlord felt was an ugly green tint.

The Rent and Tenancy Tribunal (Hyresnämnden) in Gothenburg later agreed that the colour was “deviating from what can be seen as normal and established”.

After considering the case the Tribunal ruled in favour of the landlord and the former tenant was fined 32,000 kronor.

According to Åse Sundström of the Rent and Tenancy Tribunal in Gothenburg, these extreme cases are uncommon.

Generally it is a question of ordinary wear and tear, which wouldn’t be the fault of the tenant.

“According to legislation a tenant is allowed to wallpaper or repaint the rented flat, but if the landlord thinks that the work has decreased the value of the flat he can demand compensation,” Sundström told The Local.

Although tenants are within the law carrying out work on their rented flats, Sundström said she would advise anyone thinking of doing so to consult the landlord in advance of making any major changes.

“If there is a disagreement it will always be a judgement call and not everyone will have the same views on style,” she said to The Local.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

PUNISHMENT

Norwegian prime minister fined for Covid-19 rules breach

Erna Solberg has been fined 20,000 kroner for her role in planning a dinner party at a restaurant in Geilo, southern Norway, in February.

Norwegian prime minister fined for Covid-19 rules breach
Instagram erna_solberg

The South East police district has finished its investigation into the episode and concluded that there was a breach of national infection control rules.

The Prime Minister broke infection control measures when 13 family members were gathered at the restaurant in Geilo, a popular skiing destination. At the time, only 10 people could gather in such settings.

“I take note of the police decision. I have previously said that if the restaurant visit is followed up with fines, then we will of course make up for it. I apologise for what happened and will pay the fine,” Solberg said in a statement .

Despite not being present at the meal, due to having an eye checkup in Oslo, Solberg is considered to be one of the event’s organisers as she participated in the decision to host the dinner and was involved in choosing a restaurant.

Despite police saying his role would also fall under that of an organiser, the prime minister’s husband, Sindre Finnes, will not be fined.

“The practical arrangements were made by Solberg’s husband, but Solberg was involved in the decision to eat out,” police chief Ole B. Sæverud said at a press conference.

The police said that such a case would not normally lead to punishment, unless special considerations dictate it.

They believe that this case meets the special considerations criteria as finding Solberg guilty without any punishment could have a negative impact on the population’s compliance with coronavirus restrictions.

“Even though the law is equal for everyone, not everyone is equal. Solberg is the country’s foremost elected official and has on a number of occasions fronted the government’s decisions on measures to counter the pandemic. It is therefore considered appropriate to react with punishment, in order to maintain the public’s trust in the infection control rules,” Sæverud said.

READ ALSO: 

The restaurant Solberg’s family ate at, Hallingstuene, will not receive a fine.

“If we had come across the incident while it was taking place, we would have clarified the regulations and, if necessary, given orders to end the event. A punitive response would only be considered if the event was carried out in a clearly contagious manner, or there was a case of repeated violation,” said Sæverud.

The prime minister’s family met twice over a weekend in late February as part of her 60th birthday celebrations in Geilo. On the Saturday there were more than 10 people present at an apartment they had rented. However, as the regulations were unclear at the time police said that this was not a criminal violation.

Solberg apologised for the breach when it was first reported in March.

“I, who every single day stand and speak about infection control to the Norwegian people, should have known the rules better. But the truth is that I have not checked the rules well enough, and thus not realiisd that when a family goes out together and there are more than ten persons, it is actually an event,” she said at the time.  

SHOW COMMENTS