SHARE
COPY LINK

TRIAL

French court delays ruling on IMF’s Lagarde

A French court on Friday delayed its ruling on whether the new head of the IMF, former French finance minister Christine Lagarde, will face a criminal probe over her handling of a tycoon's lawsuit.

French court delays ruling on IMF's Lagarde
MEDEF (File)

The Court of Justice of the Republic, which is charged with deciding whether ministers can be investigated over alleged offences committed in office, said it had pushed back its much-anticipated decision until August 4th.

A statement from the court said simply that one of its members had “belatedly” decided to recuse himself from the case, delaying proceedings.

It had been due to rule on Friday, just three days after Lagarde took up her new responsibilities at the International Monetary Fund, the world’s lender of last resort and a pillar of global financial governance.

The IMF board chose Lagarde for the job despite allegations that she abused her authority in cutting short a legal battle between tycoon Bernard Tapie and his bank and sending the parties into binding arbitration.

The arbitration panel eventually decided the businessman should be paid 385 million euros from the public purse in damages and interest after the alleged mishandling by Credit Lyonnais of the sale of his sportswear brand Adidas.

Credit Lyonnais was state-run at the time of disputed transaction, and its debts were later collected under the CDR — a “bad bank” set up and run by the state to regroup the group’s disputed and bad debts.

As such, the damages and interest owed to Tapie, of which he has reportedly already received around 200 million euros, have had to come from the public purse, triggering public anger at a time of economic austerity.

Lagarde’s political opponents have criticised the decision to cut short the legal battle between the CDR and Tapie, an acquaintance of President Nicolas Sarkozy, and prosecutors allege she may have exceeded her powers.

Last month, judicial sources told AFP that prosecutors have begun a second inquiry into whether the head of the CDR concealed information relevant to the arbitration from his own board.

Lagarde is not personally targeted in this second inquiry, but the official was under her ministry’s authority and the investigation has only added to the climate of suspicion surrounding her handling of the Tapie case.

Officials in Lagarde’s office, speaking on condition of anonymity, last month dismissed the latest allegations as a rehash of a report on a news website earlier this month “with the same errors and inaccuracies”.

She, meanwhile, insists she herself did nothing wrong in taking a decision she said saved time and public money by halting a lengthy legal battle.

Lagarde, a 55-year-old former corporate lawyer, took up the Washington post at the IMF to replace the previous French leader of the institution, economist and Socialist politician Dominique Strauss-Kahn.

Strauss-Kahn was forced to resign when he was arrested after being accused of sexual assault by a New York hotel maid. His trial continues, despite the prosecution admitting to doubts about the alleged victim’s testimony.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

TRIAL

Danish terror trial begins against Iranian separatists

Three leaders of an Iranian Arab separatist group pleaded not guilty to financing and promoting terrorism in Iran with Saudi Arabia's backing, as their trial opened in Denmark on Thursday.

Danish terror trial begins against Iranian separatists
File photo: Mads Claus Rasmussen/Ritzau Scanpix

The three risk 12 years in prison if found guilty.

Aged 39 to 50, the trio are members of the separatist organisation ASMLA (Arab Struggle Movement for the Liberation of Ahvaz), which is based in Denmark and the Netherlands and which Iran considers a terrorist group.

The three, one of whom is a Danish citizen, have been held in custody in Denmark since February 2020.

Gert Dyrn, lawyer for the eldest of the three, told AFP that in his client’s opinion “what they are charged with is legitimate resistance towards an oppressive regime.”

“They are not denying receiving money from multiple sources, including Saudi Arabia, to help the movement and help them accomplish their political aim,” Dyrn said. 

His client has lived as a refugee in Denmark since 2006. 

According to the charge sheet seen by AFP, the three received around 30 million kroner (four million euros, $4.9 million) for ASMLA and its armed branch, through bank accounts in Austria and the United Arab Emirates.

The trio is also accused of spying on people and organisations in Denmark between 2012 and 2020 for Saudi intelligence.

Finally, they are also accused of promoting terrorism and “encouraging the activities of the terrorist movement Jaish Al-Adl, which has activities in Iran, by supporting them with advice, promotion, and coordinating attacks.”

The case dates back to 2018 when one of the three was the target of a foiled attack on Danish soil believed to be sponsored by the Iranian regime in retaliation for the killing of 24 people in Ahvaz, southwestern Iran, in September 2018.

READ ALSO:

Tehran formally denied the attack plan in Denmark, but a Danish court last year jailed a Norwegian-Iranian for seven years for his role in the plot. 

That attack put Danish authorities on the trail of the trio’s ASMLA activities.

Sunni Saudi Arabia is the main rival in the Middle East of Shia Iran, and Tehran regularly accuses it, along with Israel and the United States, of supporting separatist groups.

Lawyer Gert Dyrn said this was “the first case in Denmark within terror law where you have to consider who is a terrorist and who is a freedom fighter.”

SHOW COMMENTS