SHARE
COPY LINK

CRIME

Police doctor acquitted over forced vomiting death

A police doctor has been acquitted in Germany for the second time for his involvement in force-feeding a small-time drug dealer with litres of water and an emetic to make him throw up, after which he died.

Police doctor acquitted over forced vomiting death
Photo: DPA

Laye Condé from Sierra Leone fell into a coma and died after having litres of water and the vomiting-inducing drug forced into his stomach via a tube while being held in police custody in Bremen in 2004.

Doctors disagreed on why the 35-year-old Condé died, with four saying he died due to water he inhaled during the forced procedure, but another four saying he had been killed by a heart defect which the doctor had no way of knowing about.

The state prosecutor had called for the doctor, named only as Igor V., to be convicted of causing death by negligence and sentenced to nine months on probation. His defence had called for the acquittal that he received on Tuesday.

Elke Maleika, the Bremen lawyer representing Condè’s family, told The Local that the first court hearing of the shocking case in 2008 had concluded that his death was caused by negligence, but the doctor was still acquitted. The court said that although the doctor had made mistakes, he did not have the experience or training necessary to recognise the danger his ‘patient’s was in.

This decision was overruled by the Federal Court, which also said the doctor’s treatment of Condé was unreasonable and inhumane.

Yet even the judges there said the doctor should not be harshly sentenced, accepting the case that he was incapable of dealing with the situation. The doctor, originally from Kazakhstan, worked for the police on a freelance basis and had hardly any practical experience, the judges said.

Maleika explained that the entire case was heard again this year, and the judge concluded that because expert witnesses could not agree on the cause of Condè’s death, the doctor should be acquitted.

“This is a different situation because the court said today that it could not be certain of cause of death,” she said. “For me that is a more acceptable result.”

But she acknowledged that this might not be the case for Condè’s family. “I think for the family it is difficult to understand that another court hasn’t been able to decide what happened to Laye. For them I think the reasoning behind the acquittal will make no difference.”

When asked whether other people involved in the use of the technique of force-feeding emetics and water to suspects or the employment of an incapable doctor could have faced charges, Maleika said the state prosecutor had looked at a number of people.

“But because the initial charge was of causing death by negligence, in time the statute of limitations had been reached and nothing could be done – it was already too late,” she said. The plaintiffs have a week to decide whether to appeal Tuesday’s verdict.

One of the police officers who had arrested Condé told the court this time around that he had swallowed something shortly before his apprehension. He and his colleague said they suspected this might have been packets of drugs and took him to the station.

When Condé refused at the police station to voluntarily take the emetic drug to make him throw up, he was tied to a chair with hands and feet.

The doctor pushed a tube through Condé’s nose in order to force water and the emetic directly into his stomach. This made him throw up a small ball of cocaine, which as Die Welt reported, was sufficient evidence on which to charge him.

But the doctor repeated the procedure, according to the taz newspaper, even after he had personally called an emergency doctor because Condé was no longer responsive.

“At one point the black African was pretty quiet. He did not move any more,” the officer told the court.

White foam was coming from his nose and mouth. He died 11 days later in hospital.

Afterwards it turned out he had swallowed five small packets containing cocaine, with an estimated total street value of €100.

The doctor’s lawyer argued that the forced administration of emetics had been accepted and even championed by the Bremen authorities for years.

The practice was stopped in Germany after a 2006 ruling from the European Court of Human Rights on another case of forcing emetics into the stomach of another suspected drug dealer. It said such a procedure violated the European Convention on Human Rights which prohibits inhuman and degrading treatment.

DPA/DAPD/The Local/hc

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

PROTESTS

FACT CHECK: Are foreign language protests really forbidden in Germany?

After a group of Irish protestors were told by Berlin police to stop singing songs in Gaelic while they held a pro-Palestine event, The Local looks at whether foreign language protests are really outlawed in Germany's capital.

FACT CHECK: Are foreign language protests really forbidden in Germany?

Around 40 Irish activists and Berlin residents were attending a ‘conversation circle’ in solidarity with Palestine on Friday last week – in which songs and conversations were had in Irish (Gaelic) language – when police arrived and told them to stop and disperse, according to the Irish Independent.

Police on the scene explained that only German, English and sometimes Arabic language could be used in protest. They cited concerns that banned speech, such as speeches or chants glorifying violence, could be used in foreign languages and noted that they didn’t have an Irish translator.

An Instagram post by a group called Irish Bloc Berlin, which describes itself as a “Berlin-based platform for solidarity with Palestine”, called the move unjust and unconstitutional.

On the platform they also posted select speeches made at the demonstration with English subtitles: “Myself and my friends from Ireland are here today to show our solidarity with Palestine and stand against genocide…” began a comment by a protestor identified as Aodhán. He added: “We also stand against the brutal and shameful repression of the Palestine Solidarity movement by the police.”

Ireland is known to be home to a relatively high number of people who express sympathy for Palestine, partly because many Irish people see similarities between the British colonisation of Ireland and Israel’s ongoing occupation of Palestine.

The Irish protest came a week after German authorities shut down the co-called “Palestine Congress”, just an hour after it began. The event was planned to be a three day event in support of Palestine held in front of the Bundestag.

An Irish woman named Caoimhe McAllister, who attended the protest, told the Irish Independent the action was intended “to highlight what we see as a really worrying human rights concern”. 

McAllister added that she had witnessed police cracking down on Arabic speakers during protests, including at least one arrest. Her group wanted to show how unfair it is to outlaw a particular language for use of protest: “We just had to highlight this by speaking in Irish”.

Are language bans legal in Germany?

Asked for clarification on whether foreign language protests were allowed in Germany, a Berlin police spokesperson told The Local that they “decide on restrictions for assemblies on a case-by-case basis”.

The Irish protest took place within a protest camp which has been stationed in the sculpture park west of Heinrich-von-Gagern-Straße since April 8th. This particular camp is subject to the restriction that speeches can only be given in German and English and, at certain times, in Arabic, according to the Berlin Police.

The police spokesperson added: “In addition to this restriction, the assembly leader was informed on the occasion of the rally on April 19th that no exclamations or chants in Hebrew or Gaelic may take place. This decision is based on the Berlin Freedom of Assembly Act.”

In this case, the Berlin Police say that their own risk forecast suggested that “the assembly could lead to speeches or chants glorifying violence with potentially criminal content”, and therefore police officers on the scene needed the ability to hear what was being said so that they could enforce restrictions imposed on banned speech, like speech that incites violence, for example.

“For some languages, this is only possible with an interpreter. As there was no interpreter available for Hebrew and Gaelic in this case, it was only possible to act in advance with appropriate restrictions,” the police said.

Police powers are devolved in Germany, meaning that law enforcement is constitutionally vested solely with the states, so the way foreign language protests are treated may be different in other parts of the country.

Following the reconstruction, after WWII, Germany has gained a largely positive reputation for its commitment to protect freedom of speech and the right to protest. 

A key exception to this is banned speech, which in Germany includes: speech that incites hatred against people based on their racial, national, religious or ethnic background and insults that assault people based on those same factors.

But following Hamas’s attack on Israel on October 7th, 2023, and the steady rise of pro-Palestine activism in response to Israel’s war of retaliation that has killed more than 30,000 civilians, activists and civil rights organisations alike are beginning to question if Germany’s speech restrictions are being applied fairly.

PODCAST: Germany’s cannabis law explained and Berlinale backlash

Civil rights in decline in Germany?

In a recent report by global civil society alliance CIVICUS, the state of civic space in Germany was downgraded. 

CIVICUS Monitor researchers documented German authorities breaking up pro-Palestinian protests in late 2023 with excessive force — deploying pepper spray and water cannons and arresting hundreds.

The CIVICUS notes that German authorities have also used disproportionate measures against the Last Generation climate movement, including raids on homes, seizing bank accounts and blocking websites in response to non-violent civil disobedience.

“Germany used to be one of the most free countries in Europe…” said Tara Petrović, CIVICUS Monitor’s Europe and Central Asia researcher.

“Germany’s downgrade should be a wake-up call for the country and continent to change course.”

The CIVICUS report notes Berlin and Frankfurt specifically, as places where authorities banned pro-Palestinian protests.

“The German authorities’ actions against activists exercising legitimate rights to association and peaceful assembly are not conducive to a democratic state,” said Petrović. 

SHOW COMMENTS