SHARE
COPY LINK

EUROPEAN UNION

More EU citizens join the ranks of Stockholm’s homeless

On Europe Day, May 9th, many will no doubt celebrate the increased mobility of EU citizens, but open borders and bureaucracy have also resulted in rising numbers of homeless EU citizens in Stockholm, The Local's Geoff Mortimore discovers.

More EU citizens join the ranks of Stockholm's homeless
A file picture of a reception centre run by Stockholms Stadsmission

For many visitors to Stockholm, it comes as some relief to see how few people live on the streets, sleeping rough.

For the most part, homelessness does not appear to be a major issue. However, scratch under the surface and it becomes clear that it is a problem on the rise.

In most major capitals around the world, the sight of homeless people camping out in shop entrances or under cardboard roofs is nothing unusual.

It may be less common in Stockholm, but one group in particular is causing concern – over the past twelve months there has been a noticeable rise in the number of Europeans, from what was formerly known as the Eastern Bloc but who are now citizens of the European Union, who come here seeking better conditions than those they have left behind, but find life cold in more ways than one.

At Pelarbacken, a small reception centre at Stockholm’s Erste Hospital, Rolf Byström treats a young Romanian man, displaced from his own country, but homeless and in need of help in Sweden.

It is a sight which Byström, a man with extensive experience of looking after the homeless, says is becoming ever more common.

“We have seen a big rise in the number of EU citizens finding themselves homeless here over the past year,” he tells The Local.

“What makes this group different is that they do not have the normal illnesses you associate with the homeless. They are often young, generally quite healthy, between 25 and 30, and don’t normally have the kind of addiction problems one associates with the homeless.

“Their ailments are more psychosomatic,” continues Byström.

“They come about as a direct result of having nowhere to live. They can be depressed, have problems with their joints, bad stomachs, migraines, things like that.”

Their biggest problem, though, is red tape.

“Even though, thanks to the freedom of movement rights within the EU they are allowed to be here, because they don’t have the right paperwork they are not allowed proper long-term treatment, which in some cases can be relatively simple,” he explains.

“It is a huge problem and one those of us who live and work in Sweden should be able to help with.”

For a medical professional like Byström, the situation is extremely frustrating.

“It is terrible as a doctor not to be able to give treatment to the people that need it”, he adds.

The opening of a new centre for the homeless in Stockholm on March 1st this year is, in some ways, a positive step, but it also underlines the depth of a problem that is growing almost daily as more and more Europeans who have come to the Swedish capital find themselves caught in a bureaucratic trap that all too often leads to unemployment and homelessness.

The centre, located on the island of Södermalm in central Stockholm, is part of the Crossroads project, an effort funded by contributions from the EU, Stockholm City and the National Public Employment Service (Arbetsförmedlingen), to help job seeking migrants from within the EU find their feet in Sweden.

The money pays for food, rooms, furniture, computers and five full-time employees. In addition there are also some 40 volunteers, including psychologists, lawyers and interpreters.

Those coming from EU countries, especially Romania, but also Poland and the Baltics, face a paradoxical problem. They have the right to be in Sweden and obtain certain benefits as long as they can support themselves they are covered by insurances from their homeland.

All too often though, they don’t make use of the benefits to which they are entitled.

Although citizens of EU member states are free to take advantage of the freedom of movement provided by EU membership, each member state still has its own regulations governing how it determines who qualifies for benefits.

In the case of Sweden, rights are severely restricted for people who do not have a regular job or if they lack Swedish citizenship.

And while people from other EU member states can apply for citizenship in Sweden, they must reside in the country for three to five years and have been granted permanent residency before doing so.

Furthermore, as EU citizens they are not allowed to stay in the other homeless shelters provided by the state and NGOs around the city.

For many, unbeknown to them, the problems can start even before they arrive.

The Stockholms Stadsmission charity, one of the city’s main homelessness assistance organisations and a main driver behind the Crossroads project, recently conducted interviews with 68 homeless people staying at Crossroads shelter.

Many were found to have extensive work experience in their home countries and often have had short-term jobs in Sweden.

The interviews also revealed, however, a number of common misconceptions among the shelters residents about the rights and responsibilities of being an EU citizen.

Many believe, for example, that just having lived in an EU country for a while will entitle them to the same rights as full citizens.

In addition, many were also they are further misled about the ease of finding cheap accommodation and a job in Stockholm.

“Many want to go home but end up in a situation where they do not have the money for the journey back,” Stadsmission project manager Malena Bonnier said in a recent interview with the Dagens Nyheter (DN) newspaper

“They are referred to social services, which refers to the embassy, which usually says no. Then they are stuck here.”

As with all such issues, it is hard to quantify exactly how many people there are living on the streets as there are no official statistics.

But one thing that those working in shelters for the homeless all agree on is that the number homeless in Stockholm is growing fast.

“This is a frightening proof of the difference between the rich and the poor – on a personal and national level,” Byström concludes.

“To put it cynically, it is the export of poverty, and an issue that badly needs addressing. As Swedes living in a rich country we can and should do more.”

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

BREXIT

OPINION: Pre-Brexit Brits in Europe should be given EU long-term residency

The EU has drawn up plans to make it easier for non-EU citizens to gain longterm EU residency so they can move more easily around the bloc, but Italy-based citizens' rights campaigner Clarissa Killwick says Brits who moved to the EU before Brexit are already losing out.

OPINION: Pre-Brexit Brits in Europe should be given EU long-term residency

With all the talk about the EU long-term residency permit and the proposed improvements there is no mention that UK citizens who are Withdrawal Agreement “beneficiaries” are currently being left out in the cold.

The European Commission has stated that we can hold multiple statuses including the EU long-term permit (Under a little-known EU law, third-country nationals can in theory acquire EU-wide long-term resident status if they have lived ‘legally’ in an EU country for at least five years) but in reality it is just not happening.

This effectively leaves Brits locked into their host countries while other third country nationals can enjoy some mobility rights. As yet, in Italy, it is literally a question of the computer saying no if someone tries to apply.

The lack of access to the EU long-term permit to pre-Brexit Brits is an EU-wide issue and has been flagged up to the European Commission but progress is very slow.

READ ALSO: EU government settle on rules for how non-EU citizens could move around Europe

My guess is that few UK nationals who already have permanent residency status under the Withdrawal Agreement are even aware of the extra mobility rights they could have with the EU long-term residency permit – or do not even realise they are two different things.

Perhaps there won’t be very large numbers clamouring for it but it is nothing short of discrimination not to make it accessible to British people who’ve built their lives in the EU.

They may have lost their status as EU citizens but nothing has changed concerning the contributions they make, both economically and socially.

An example of how Withdrawal Agreement Brits in Italy are losing out

My son, who has lived almost his whole life here, wanted to study in the Netherlands to improve his employment prospects.

Dutch universities grant home fees rather than international fees to holders of an EU long-term permit. The difference in fees for a Master’s, for example, is an eye-watering €18,000. He went through the application process, collecting the requisite documents, making the payments and waited many months for an appointment at the “questura”, (local immigration office).

On the day, it took some persuading before they agreed he should be able to apply but then the whole thing was stymied because the national computer system would not accept a UK national. I am in no doubt, incidentally, that had he been successful he would have had to hand in his WA  “carta di soggiorno”.

This was back in February 2022 and nothing has budged since then. In the meantime, it is a question of pay up or give up for any students in the same boat as my son. There is, in fact, a very high take up of the EU long-term permit in Italy so my son’s non-EU contemporaries do not face this barrier.

Long-term permit: The EU’s plan to make freedom of movement easier for non- EU nationals 

Completing his studies was stalled by a year until finally his Italian citizenship came through after waiting over 5 years.  I also meet working adults in Italy with the EU long-term permit who use it for work purposes, such as in Belgium and Germany, and for family reunification.  

Withdrawal agreement card should double up as EU long-term residency permit

A statement that Withdrawal Agreement beneficiaries should be able to hold multiple statuses is not that easy to find. You have to scroll quite far down the page on the European Commission’s website to find a link to an explanatory document. It has been languishing there since March 2022 but so far not proved very useful.

It has been pointed out to the Commission that the document needs to be multilingual not just in English and “branded” as an official communication from the Commission so it can be used as a stand-alone. But having an official document you can wave at the immigration authorities is going to get you nowhere if Member State governments haven’t acknowledged that WA beneficiaries can hold multiple statuses and issue clear guidance and make sure systems are modified accordingly.

I can appreciate this is no mean feat in countries where they do not usually allow multiple statuses or, even if they do, issue more than one residency card. Of course, other statuses we should be able to hold are not confined to EU long-term residency, they should include the EU Blue Card, dual nationality, family member of an EU citizen…

Personally, I do think people should be up in arms about this. The UK and EU negotiated an agreement which not only removed our freedom of movement as EU citizens, it also failed to automatically give us equal mobility rights to other third country nationals. We are now neither one thing nor the other.

It would seem the only favour the Withdrawal Agreement did us was we didn’t have to go out and come back in again! Brits who follow us, fortunate enough to get a visa, may well pip us at the post being able to apply for EU long-term residency as clearly defined non-EU citizens.

I have been bringing this issue to the attention of the embassy in Rome, FCDO and the European Commission for three years now. I hope we will see some movement soon.

Finally, there should be no dragging of heels assuming we will all take citizenship of our host countries. Actually, we shouldn’t have to, my son was fortunate, even though it took a long time. Others may not meet the requirements or wish to give up their UK citizenship in countries which do not permit dual nationality.  

Bureaucratic challenges may seem almost insurmountable but why not simply allow our Withdrawal Agreement permanent card to double up as the EU long-term residency permit.

Clarissa Killwick,

Since 2016, Clarissa has been a citizens’ rights campaigner and advocate with the pan-European group, Brexpats – Hear Our Voice.
She is co-founder and co-admin of the FB group in Italy, Beyond Brexit – UK citizens in Italy.

SHOW COMMENTS