SHARE
COPY LINK
SOCIAL DEMOCRATS IN TURMOIL

SOCIAL DEMOCRATS

Social Democrats face chaos as Sahlin departs

Sweden's Social Democrats, for decades the dominant force in Swedish national politics, are facing chaos after leader Mona Sahlin announced her imminent departure over the weekend, with no clear successor to fill her shoes, writes the AFP's Rita Devlin Marier.

Social Democrats face chaos as Sahlin departs

“It’s really chaos…It’s shocking for many Social Democrats,” said Stig-Björn Ljunggren, a political scientist and commentator known to have leftist sympathies.

“It’s rare there are chaotic changes” in the Social Democratic Party, he told AFP, adding he had no idea who could be in a position to lead the party next.

Sahlin announced Sunday she would maintain her position until a special party congress scheduled for March, quitting after only four years at the helm of the party.

“I have played an important role. Now it’s up to others to do so,” she told reporters, calling her decision “fair and right for me and the party.”

The 53-year-old career politician led a three-party left-wing opposition into the September elections in the hopes of becoming Sweden’s first female prime minister.

However, she failed to prevent Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt’s re-election.

Worse, the Social Democrats, which for most of the 20th century was Sweden’s governing force, suffered a catastrophic defeat and only narrowly maintained their position as the country’s largest party.

For many commentators, the result marked the end of an era.

Although the party initially stood behind Sahlin, with few voices openly criticising her leadership, a portrait of a party in disarray quickly emerged in the Swedish press.

Her departure was thus “partly a surprise” Ljungren said, pointing out that the party traditionally changes leadership in a very routine, “bureaucratic” manner.

The problem for the party is that there has long been a lack of clear challengers for Sahlin’s job — and on Monday, several politicians tipped as possible successors said they were not interested in taking over.

The hugely popular Margot Wallström has repeatedly said she does not want the job.

Wallström who currently serves as the United Nations Special Representative on Sexual Violence in Conflict and is the former vice-president of the European Commission, made it clear Monday that she had not changed her position.

“I intend to complete my current UN mandate which will be evaluated in March 2012,” she said, the Swedish news agency TT reported.

The Dagens Nyheter daily speculated she had her sights set on becoming the UN’s first woman secretary general.

Charismatic former justice minister Thomas Bodström, who came second to Wallström in a poll of Social Democrats’ favorite leadership figures, has also said he is not in the running.

Sahlin, a former minister and vice prime minister, was elected to the party leadership in March 2007.

Her time at the top is unusually short for a Social Democrat, especially when compared to former party heavyweights whose leadership could be measured in decades.

Swedish political legend Tage Erlander led the party — and the country — for 23 years between 1946 and 1969. Olof Palme led it from 1969 until his assasination in 1986, governing Sweden for 11 years during that period.

Sahlin’s predecessor, Göran Persson, led the party for 10 years until he was defeated by Reinfeldt’s centre-right coalition in the 2006 election.

Her departure is “unlike anything the Social Democrats in Sweden have seen before,” said Peter Esaiasson, a political scientist at Gothenburg University.

However, he acknowledged that “at the European level, [this kind of crisis] is nothing new.”

Long synonymous with Sweden’s cradle-to-the-grave welfare state, the party easily garnered around 45 percent of the votes up until the mid-1990s. This year, it won just 30.6 percent.

As for the 2014 vote, “They don’t stand a chance as it looks now,”

Ljunggren cautioned.

“People usually say the party is the pillar of the [Swedish] state,” he said.

Now, he added, it “seems as if it can’t even support its own weight.”

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

POLITICS

Social Democrat leader backs Sweden’s harsh new immigration policies

The leader of Sweden's Social Democrat opposition has backed the harsh new policies on crime and immigration included in the new government's programme, and even signalled openness to the much-criticised begging ban.

Social Democrat leader backs Sweden's harsh new immigration policies

In an interview with the Expressen newspaper, Magdalena Andersson said her party was absolutely agreed on the need for a stricter immigration policy for Sweden, going so far as to take credit for the Social Democrats for the illiberal shift. 

“There is absolutely no question that need a strict set of migration laws,” she told the Expressen newspaper, rejecting the claims of Sweden Democrat Jimmie Åkesson that the government’s new program represented a “paradigm shift in migration policy”. 

“The paradigm shift happened in 2015, and it was us who carried it out,” she said. “The big rearrangement of migration policy was carried out by us Social Democrats after the refugee crisis of 2015, with a thoroughgoing tightening up of the policy.” 

READ ALSO:

She said that her party would wait and see what “concrete proposals” the new government ended up making, but she said the Social Democrats were not in principle against even the new government’s most criticised proposal: to slash the number of UN quota refugees from around 5,000 to 900. 

“That’s something we are going to look at,” she said. “It’s been at different levels at different points of time in Sweden.” 

Rather than criticise the new government for being too extreme on migration, Andersson even attacked it for not being willing to go far enough. 

The Social Democrats’ plan to tighten up labour market migration by bringing back the system of labour market testing, she said, was stricter than the plan to increase the salary threshold proposed by Ulf Kristersson’s new government.  

When it comes to the new government’s plans to bring in much tougher punishments for a string of crimes, Andersson criticised the new government for not moving fast enough. 

“What I think is important here is that there are a completed proposals for new laws already on the table which need to be put into effect,” she said. 

She also said she was not opposed to plans for a national ban on begging. 

“We Social Democrats believe that people should have the possibility to get educated, and work so they can support themselves,” she said. “That’s something we’ve believed in all along. You shouldn’t need to stand there holding your cap in your hand.” 

“It’s already possible to bring in a ban in certain municipalities today,” she continued. “So the question is really whether this should be regulated at a national or a local level. We did not decide at out national congress that it should be regulated at a national level, but when the inquiry publishes its conclusions, we will assess the advantages and disadvantages and decide on whether we will keep our position or change.” 

Where she was critical of the new government was in its failure to discuss how it would increase the budgets for municipalities and regional governments, who she said face being forced to drive through savage cuts in real spending to schools, healthcare and elderly care if they were not prioritised in the coming budget. 

“But that’s such a tiny part of this slottsavtal (“Mansion agreement”), and the government’s policy programme suggests they’ve missed something that should really be in focus for the government,” she said, warning that citizens should be braced for dramatic fall in the quality of welfare in the coming years. 

She said her party would also campaign against the new government’s plans to scrap Sweden’s goal of spending one percent of GDP on aid, and also against the new government’s plans to make it harder to build wind energy projects. 

SHOW COMMENTS