SHARE
COPY LINK

SOCIAL DEMOCRATS

Election Q&A: the Social Democratic Party

Social Democratic Party Secretary Ibrahim Baylan answers some questions from The Local about the party's stance on a few key issues.

The Local: Why should someone vote for your party?

Ibrahim Baylan: This is an election of destiny. It will determine the course that Sweden will take in the future. Should we have four years of tax cuts for the wealthiest or should we have a Sweden that invests in new jobs and better quality schools and health care? Our goal is that Sweden will become a land of opportunity for all, where each and every one – regardless of background – gets the chance to realise their dreams.

TL: What is this election about? What is the key question facing Swedish voters?

IB: We must ensure that more people have a job to go to. Today, there are too few job opportunities for job seekers. Our youth unemployment is one of Europe’s highest. The number of long-term unemployed has increased dramatically – nearly one in three who are currently unemployed have been unemployed long-term. The economy runs a deficit when taxes are cut with borrowed money. The wealth gaps between people increase. We Social Democrats want to reverse the trend.

TL: What is your party going to do about this issue?

IB: In times of high unemployment, people should have the opportunity to acquire new skills so that they can take on new jobs when the economy improves. We want to invest in climate-smart solutions, housing, infrastructure, research and education. This will result in more businesses and new jobs.

More jobs means a better economy. We can then improve the quality of health care and schools – and diminish the widening gaps. It is smarter to solve problems together than to pit the young against the elderly, the sick against the healthy, men against women and the unemployed against those who have jobs. Sweden gains through equality.

TL: What does your party see as the key to helping non-Swedes successfully establish themselves in Sweden?

IB: Language and jobs are the important keys to integration. It takes too long for newly arrived refugees and immigrants to enter the labour market. New arrivals should be entitled to an individual establishment plan. It would include an analysis of new arrivals’ previous education and skills. A successful job policy plays a key role in breaking segregation.

A higher quality for [the immigrant language training programme] Swedish for Immigrants (Svenska för invandrare, SFI) and higher enrollment in schools are important parts of our new integration policy. Accordingly, we would invest in improving SFI.

TL: What do you say to foreign students who come here to study, but find it hard to find a job?

IB: We want all education to result in good access to the labor market and good opportunities for securing an internship. As such, we want to provide directed support to educational institutions for more internships and strengthened requirements so students can receive credit in their post-secondary programmes for their work experience. Internships can be a good way to transition into employment after graduation.

TL: What is your party’s top foreign policy issue?

IB: An equitable world is possible and is based on international law. Our international laws should apply to all countries whether big or small. We want to strengthen the United Nations’ ability to act both in acute crises and to face the long-term global challenges the world faces.

The EU should be used for greater global justice. An equitable world is also based on generous aid and in free, fair and sustainable trade.

To return to the election guide main page, click here.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

POLITICS

Social Democrat leader backs Sweden’s harsh new immigration policies

The leader of Sweden's Social Democrat opposition has backed the harsh new policies on crime and immigration included in the new government's programme, and even signalled openness to the much-criticised begging ban.

Social Democrat leader backs Sweden's harsh new immigration policies

In an interview with the Expressen newspaper, Magdalena Andersson said her party was absolutely agreed on the need for a stricter immigration policy for Sweden, going so far as to take credit for the Social Democrats for the illiberal shift. 

“There is absolutely no question that need a strict set of migration laws,” she told the Expressen newspaper, rejecting the claims of Sweden Democrat Jimmie Åkesson that the government’s new program represented a “paradigm shift in migration policy”. 

“The paradigm shift happened in 2015, and it was us who carried it out,” she said. “The big rearrangement of migration policy was carried out by us Social Democrats after the refugee crisis of 2015, with a thoroughgoing tightening up of the policy.” 

READ ALSO:

She said that her party would wait and see what “concrete proposals” the new government ended up making, but she said the Social Democrats were not in principle against even the new government’s most criticised proposal: to slash the number of UN quota refugees from around 5,000 to 900. 

“That’s something we are going to look at,” she said. “It’s been at different levels at different points of time in Sweden.” 

Rather than criticise the new government for being too extreme on migration, Andersson even attacked it for not being willing to go far enough. 

The Social Democrats’ plan to tighten up labour market migration by bringing back the system of labour market testing, she said, was stricter than the plan to increase the salary threshold proposed by Ulf Kristersson’s new government.  

When it comes to the new government’s plans to bring in much tougher punishments for a string of crimes, Andersson criticised the new government for not moving fast enough. 

“What I think is important here is that there are a completed proposals for new laws already on the table which need to be put into effect,” she said. 

She also said she was not opposed to plans for a national ban on begging. 

“We Social Democrats believe that people should have the possibility to get educated, and work so they can support themselves,” she said. “That’s something we’ve believed in all along. You shouldn’t need to stand there holding your cap in your hand.” 

“It’s already possible to bring in a ban in certain municipalities today,” she continued. “So the question is really whether this should be regulated at a national or a local level. We did not decide at out national congress that it should be regulated at a national level, but when the inquiry publishes its conclusions, we will assess the advantages and disadvantages and decide on whether we will keep our position or change.” 

Where she was critical of the new government was in its failure to discuss how it would increase the budgets for municipalities and regional governments, who she said face being forced to drive through savage cuts in real spending to schools, healthcare and elderly care if they were not prioritised in the coming budget. 

“But that’s such a tiny part of this slottsavtal (“Mansion agreement”), and the government’s policy programme suggests they’ve missed something that should really be in focus for the government,” she said, warning that citizens should be braced for dramatic fall in the quality of welfare in the coming years. 

She said her party would also campaign against the new government’s plans to scrap Sweden’s goal of spending one percent of GDP on aid, and also against the new government’s plans to make it harder to build wind energy projects. 

SHOW COMMENTS