SHARE
COPY LINK

MALMÖ

Sweden plays host to anti-globalization activists

More than 20,000 anti-globalization activists are due in Malmö this week to take part in the European Social Forum, hoping to breathe new life into a movement many say is

rapidly losing speed.

The anti-globalization movement entered the political scene in 1999 with loud protests on the sidelines of the World Trade Organisation meeting in Seattle — promoting democracy, economic justice and environmental protection — but activists admit its influence has waned in recent years and the movement is now struggling to regain its former dynamism and strength.

Known today as the alter-globalization movement, it aims to promote concrete alternatives to what many feel is the capitalist nature of globalization, pushing instead for global cooperation on social issues.

The European Social Forum in the southern town of Malmö, Sweden’s third-largest city, is the fifth such meeting to be held since 2002. The last one took place in Athens in 2006.

The meeting, which opens on Wednesday and closes on Sunday, will feature some 250 seminars and 400 cultural activities, all under the theme “Making another Europe possible.”

Around 800 associations, non-governmental organizations, unions and other networks will take part.

The activists will discuss a slew of subjects, ranging from social issues in Europe to women’s and oppressed people’s rights, as well as the international financial crisis, AIDS and climate change.

Contrary to previous forums, this year’s ESF is expected to yield “proposals to bring about real solutions,” Susan George, the head of the Transnational Institute (TNI) which provides critical analyses of global problems, told AFP.

In the past, delegates spent “too much time on explanations, on descriptions, and on analyzing various crises,” she said.

“This time, we’re really going to talk about Europe among Europeans and see how we can together create a more democratic, more social, more environmental Europe.”

George also said that the geographic location of the meeting — Scandinavia — was a good omen for the forum.

“These are countries that are very, very advanced, with small populations and solid traditions of democracy, so it’s very good that the meeting is taking place there,” she said.

Meanwhile, Christophe Aguiton, a researcher and member of the French Attac movement, said that climate change issues would be in the spotlight, with just 15 months to go before a UN climate summit in Copenhagen.

“There are many of us who believe that the demands of environmentalists and ecologists have to be combined with social issues,” he said.

He attributed the alter-globalisation movement’s inertia in recent years to the rise of nationalism in China and Russia among others, and the emergence of other movements providing a counterweight to the United States.

“There was a very brief moment in 2000 to 2003 when world issues seemed so global or totally centered around one actor — the United States, which was launching a war on Iraq — that a response from a global movement looked like the only possible alternative,” Aguiton explained.

“It was a period when the Social Forum had a lot of influence on the agenda because it was the only counter-power,” he added.

Today, “we have … a kind of fragmentation due to the rise of nationalism which is in fact a delayed response to the US offensive (in Iraq) in 2003,” he said.

One of the highlights of the forum will be a peaceful demonstration on Saturday with the slogan “Power to the People — Against Capitalism and Environmental Destruction. Another World is Possible!”

Calls for independent activists to demonstrate on Friday evening have also been circulating on the internet.

Similar protests in the past have turned violent.

Swedish police would not disclose the security measures being taken.

“Of course there will be special measures but we never speak about the details … There is a risk that at a time like this there will be elements or persons who want to create violence,” Malmö police spokesman Lars Förstell told AFP.

AFP/Delphine Touitou

SHOOTINGS

US criminologist lauds Malmö for anti-gang success

The US criminologist behind the anti-gang strategy designed to reduce the number of shootings and explosions in Malmö has credited the city and its police for the "utterly pragmatic, very professional, very focused" way they have put his ideas into practice.

US criminologist lauds Malmö for anti-gang success
Johan Nilsson/TT

In an online seminar with Malmö mayor Katrin Stjernfeldt Jammeh, David Kennedy, a professor at New York’s John Jay College of Criminal Justice, said implementing his Group Violence Intervention (GVI) strategy had gone extremely smoothly in the city.

“What really stands out about the Malmö experience is contrary to most of the places we work,” he said. “They made their own assessment of their situation on the ground, they looked at the intervention logic, they decided it made sense, and then, in a very rapid, focused and business-like fashion, they figured out how to do the work.”

He said that this contrasted with police and other authorities in most cities who attempt to implement the strategy, who tend to end up “dragging their feet”, “having huge amounts of political infighting”, and coming up with reasons why their city is too different from other cities where the strategy has been a success.

Malmö’s Sluta Skjut (Stop Shooting) pilot scheme was extended to a three-year programme this January, after its launch in 2018 coincided with a reduction in the number of shootings and explosions in the city.

“We think it’s a good medicine for Malmö for breaking the negative trend that we had,” Malmö police chief Stefan Sintéus said, pointing to the fall from 65 shootings in 2017 to 20 in 2020, and in explosions from 62 in 2017 to 17 in 2020.

A graph from Malmö police showing the reduction in the number of shootings from 2017 to 2020. Graph: Malmö Police
A graph from Malmö police showing the reduction in the number of explosions in the city between 2017 and 2020. Graph: Malmö Police

READ ALSO: 

In their second evaluation of the programme, published last month, Anna-Karin Ivert, Caroline Mellgren, and Karin Svanberg, three criminologists from Malmö University, reported that violent crime had declined significantly since the program came into force, and said that it was possible that the Sluta Skjut program was partly responsible, although it was difficult to judge exactly to what extent. 

The number of shootings had already started to decline before the scheme was launched, and in November 2019, Sweden’s national police launched Operation Rimfrost, a six-month crackdown on gang crime, which saw Malmö police reinforced by officers from across Sweden.

But Kennedy said he had “very little sympathy” for criminologists critical of the police’s decision to launch such a massive operation at the same time as Sluta Skjut, making it near impossible to evaluate the programme.

“Evaluation is there to improve public policy, public policy is not there to provide the basis for for sophisticated evaluation methodology,” he argued.

“When people with jobs to do, feel that they need to do things in the name of public safety, they should follow their professional, legal and moral judgement. Not doing something to save lives, because it’s going to create evaluation issues, I think, is simply privileging social science in a way that it doesn’t deserve.”

US criminologist David Kennedy partaking in the meeting. Photo: Richard Orange

Sluta Skjut has been based around so-called ‘call-ins’, in which known gang members on probation are asked to attend meetings, where law enforcement officials warn them that if shootings and explosions continue, they and the groups around them will be subject to intense focus from police.

At the same time, social workers and other actors in civil society offer help in leaving gang life.

Of the 250-300 young men who have been involved in the project, about 40 have been sent to prison, while 49 have joined Malmö’s ‘defector’ programme, which helps individuals leave gangs.

Kennedy warned not to focus too much on the number of those involved in the scheme who start to work with social services on leaving gang life.

“What we find in in practice is that most of the impact of this approach doesn’t come either because people go to prison or because they take services and leave gang life,” he said.

“Most of the impact comes from people simply putting their guns down and no longer being violent.”

“We think of the options as continuing to be extremely dangerous, or completely turning one’s life around. That’s not realistic in practice. Most of us don’t change that dramatically ever in our lives.”

He stressed the importance of informal social control in his method, reaching those who gang members love and respect, and encouraging them to put pressure on gang members to abstain from gun violence.

“We all care more about our mothers than we care about the police, and it turns out that if you can find the guy that this very high risk, very dangerous person respects – literally, you know, little old ladies will go up to him and get his attention and tell him to behave himself. And he will.”

SHOW COMMENTS